Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Grish v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
Heather Grish
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tinsley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05471
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Heather Tinsley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown-Combs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Brown-Combs and Heather A Brown-Combs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plocki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05458
Plaintiff:
Heather M Plocki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Resco v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05064
Plaintiff:
Heather Resco
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Colvin v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv05030
Plaintiff:
Heather Colvin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Phelps v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05091
Plaintiff:
Heather Joanne Phelps and Heather J Phelps
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Raab v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03017
Plaintiff:
Heather L Raab
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Raab v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03222
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Heather L Raab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bauman v. Saul
as 4:2020cv05228
Plaintiff:
Heather Bauman
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1225
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
