Cases 31 - 37 of 37
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Edgewood
as 3:2012cv06057
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
City of Edgewood
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332 Violation of Telecommunications Act of 1996
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of Albany
as 3:2012cv04302
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of Albany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of San Carlos
as 4:2011cv05674
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of San Carlos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al
as 09-17218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN MCARDLE
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 4:2009cv01117
Plaintiff:
Steven McArdle and Steven McArdle
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2009cv01117
Plaintiff:
Steven McArdle and Steven McArdle
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sprint PCS Assets v. City of Palos Verdes, et al
as 05-56106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPRINT PCS ASSETS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, wholly-owned by Sprint Telephony PCS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, a California municipality, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, its governing body, JOSEPH SHERWOOD, in his official capacity as Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Palos Verdes Estates and others
Amicus Curiae:
PCIA - THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION, AND THE DAS FORUM, THE CALIFORNIA WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, NEWPATH NETWORKS, LLC AND EXTENET SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA) LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
