Cases 61 - 70 of 532
Shriver et al v. Partnership HealthPlan of California
as 3:2022cv03719
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shriver and James Lee
Defendant:
Partnership HealthPlan of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
AKF, Inc. v. US Chambada, Inc. et al
as 2:2022mc00055
Plaintiff:
AKF, Inc. dba Fundkite and AKF, Inc. doing business as Fundkite
Defendant:
US Chambada, Inc. dba Sushi by Chambada, Hee S. Lee and US Chambada, Inc. doing business as Sushi by Chambada
Daniel Lee v. Apothaker Scian P.C. et al
as 2:2022cv01622
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee
Defendant:
Apothaker Scian P.C. and Cavalry SPV I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CXO Nexus, Inc. v. Lee
as 3:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
CXO Nexus, Inc.
Defendant:
Theran Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jamie Stanton v. San Bernardino County Children and Family Services et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Petitioner:
Jamie Lee Stanton
Respondent:
San Bernardino County Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Froelich v. John Muir Medical Center et al
as 4:2021cv08319
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Froelich, Jr.
Defendant:
John Muir Medical Center, Nagui Samaan Achamallah, Naveen Chandra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Gavert, by and through his successor in interest, Geraldine Gavert et al v. CF Modesto, LLC et al
as 1:2021at01084
Plaintiff:
James Gavert, by and through his successor in interest, Geraldine Gavert, Geraldine Gavert, Rhonda Gavert and others
Defendant:
CF Modesto, LLC Doing business as Modesto Post Acute Center, a California limited liability company, Michael Lee Brodie, M.D., Andreh Saralou, M.D. and others
Klaneski v. Malco Enterprises of Nevada, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00651
Plaintiff:
Rosa Lee Klaneski
Defendant:
Malco Enterprises of Nevada, Inc. doing business as Budget Rent A Car and Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
