Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Bens Market et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Bens Market and Adam Saif Ali Saleh
Defendant:
United States of America
BENS MARKET, a California Sole Proprietorship et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024at00441
Plaintiff:
Bens Market and Adam Saif Ali Saleh
Defendant:
United States of America
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Knights Templar Commandery et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Defendant:
Fredro Starr, Knights Tempar Commandery Zone 12, Southgate, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adam Joiner v. Janet Yellen
as 5:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
Adam Joiner
Defendant:
Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beacon Mobile LLC v. Autowash LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Beacon Mobile LLC
Defendant:
Autowash LLC, AMP Membership LLC, Insiten Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Adams et al v. Google, LLC
as 5:2023cv04191
Plaintiff:
Malissa Adams, Tracylyn Patterson, Cary Goldberg and others
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Shayla S. Davis et al v. Ahmed M. Adam et al
as 2:2023mc00101
Plaintiff:
Shayla S Davis
Defendant:
Ahmed M Adam and Kal Freight, Inc,
Yida Gao et al v. Adam Struck et al
as 2:2023mc00030
Petitioner:
Yida Gao, Sand Hill Advisors PR LLC and Shima Capital Management LLC
Respondent:
Adam Struck doing business as Struck Capital Management LLC and Struck Capital Management LLC
Adam Struck et al v. Yida Gao et al
as 2:2023mc00028
Plaintiff:
Adam Struck, Struck Capital and Struck Capital Management LLC
Defendant:
Yida Gao, Sand Hill Advisors PR LLC and Shima Capital Management LLC
Adam Struck, et al., v. Yida Gao, et al.,
as 2:2023mc00029
Plaintiff:
Adam Struck, Struck Capital and Struck Capital Management LLC
Defendant:
Yida Gao, Sand Hill Advisors PR LLC and Shima Capital Management LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
