Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Ou-Young v. Grewal et al
as 5:2020mc80003
Defendant:
Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf, Taiwan, Republic of China and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
China Fortune Land Development et al v. 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLC et al
as 4:2019mc80259
Defendant:
1955 Capital China Fund GP LLC and 1955 Capital Fund I GP LLC
Plaintiff:
China Fortune Land Development and Global Industrial Development LTD.
China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd v. Shenzen Lucky Logistics Ltd.
as 2:2018mc00158
Plaintiff:
China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Shenzen Lucky Logistics Ltd.
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
as 2:2018mc00149
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Respondent:
Times 10 Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Co., Ltd.
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta (China) Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2018mc00129
Respondent:
Shoe Palace Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Ltd., Inc.
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
as 2:2018mc00116
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Co., Ltd.
Begay v. China Telecom Americas, Corp.
as 5:2018cv04834
Plaintiff:
Marlene Begay
Defendant:
China Telecom Americas, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
DEPCOM Power, Inc. v. CSUN Solar, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00729
Petitioner:
DEPCOM Power, Inc.
Respondent:
CSUN Solar, Inc. and China Electric Equipment Group Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201
In re Ex Parte Application of APPLE INC.
as 3:2016cv01930
Defendant:
China IWNCOMM Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
The Containership Company TCC A S v. Air Sea China Logistics Co. Ltd.
as 2:2015mc00293
Defendant:
Air Sea China Logistics Co. Ltd.
In Re Debtor:
The Containership Company TCC A S
Plaintiff:
The Containership Company TCC A S
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
