Cases 61 - 70 of 159
League of Wilderness Defenders, et al v. Kent Connaughton, et al
as 13-35653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and HELLS CANYON PRESERVATION COUNCIL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, UNION COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, BOISE CASCADE WOOD PRODUCTS, a Delaware limited liability company and others
WildEarth Guardians v. USDA
as 13-16071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Cottonwood Environmental Law Center , Western Watersheds Project , Gallatin Wildlife Association and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Sheep Experiment Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. USDA, et al
as 13-35253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE, an agency of the US Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the US Department of Agriculture and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
BILL MYERS
League of Wilderness Defenders v. USFS, et al
as 13-35066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity
League of Wilderness Defenders v. USFS, et al
as 13-35054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity
F.I.M. CORP., a Nevada Corporation et al v. Salazar et al
as 2:2013at00017
Plaintiff:
F.I.M. CORP., a Nevada Corporation , Fred Fulstone , Marianne F Leinassar and others
Defendant:
Kenneth L Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
F.I.M. CORP., et al v. Salazar et al
as 2:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Fred Fulstone , Marianne F Leinassar , Kristofor A Leinassar and others
Defendant:
Kenneth L Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
B & K Livestock Auction, Inc. v. Pedersen
as 3:2012cv02085
Plaintiff:
B&K Livestock Auction, Inc.
Defendant:
Katy Coba, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Idaho Recreation Council, et al v. USDA, et al
as 12-35763
Plaintiff:
VALLEY COUNTY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IDAHO RECREATION COUNCIL, CHRIS SCHWARZHOFF and LOIS SCHWARZHOFF
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TOM VILSACK, in his capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
