Cases 1 - 10 of 35
David F. Stix, Jr., et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
as 22-15603
Plaintiff:
CITY OF FERNLEY
Intervenor Plaintiff:
DAVID F. STIX, Jr. and DEENA E. EDMONSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE
State of Arizona v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
City of Fernley, et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
as 22-15400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF FERNLEY
Intervenor Plaintiff:
DAVID F. STIX, Jr. and DEENA E. EDMONSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
City of Fernley v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
City of Fernley
Defendant:
Commissioner United States Bureau of Reclamation and Ernest A. Conant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
David F Stix, Jr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper et al v. Santa Maria Valley Water Conservation District et al
as 2:2019cv08696
Defendant:
Santa Maria Valley Water Conservation District, Department of Interior, Brenda Burman, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff:
Los Padres Forestwatch and San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
People of the State of California, The et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01911
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Acting Commissioner Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary Elaine Duke and others
Plaintiff:
California Coastal Commission, The and People of the State of California, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Dave Irving, et al
as 17-35295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVE IRVING, in his official capacity as the Manager of the Leavenworth Fisheries Complex, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as the Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
USA, et al v. Walker River Irrigation Distri, et al
as 15-16478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee:
WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ESTATE OF HERBERT GARMS, et al., CIRCLE BAR N RANCH, L.L.C., et al. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
