Freedom of Information Act Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 162
Ana Muniz v. The United States Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2018cv06224
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security and The United States Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff: Ana Muniz
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 3:2018cv04105
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al.,
as 3:2018cv03359
Plaintiff: Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto and National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ACLU of Arizona, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 18-15907
Plaintiff - Appellee: ACLU OF ARIZONA and ACLU FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) v. Department of Homeland Security
as 4:2018cv02711
Plaintiff: The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) and Patrick Michels
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Schneider v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2018cv00773
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security, Department of State and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff: Alexandra Schneider
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 18-55475
: In re: BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Xavier Becerra, Attorney General and CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, a nonprofit conservation organization, SIERRA CLUB, a nonprofit public benefit corporation and ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTIONS, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, in her official capacity and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USDHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-55474
: In re: BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Plaintiff: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, a nonprofit conservation organization, SIERRA CLUB, a nonprofit public benefit corporation, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTIONS, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, in her official capacity and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 18-55476
: In re: BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, a nonprofit conservation organization, SIERRA CLUB, a nonprofit public benefit corporation and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Xavier Becerra, Attorney General and CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTIONS, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, in her official capacity and others
Human Rights Watch v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2018cv01842
Plaintiff: Human Rights Watch
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?