Cases 1 - 10 of 67
SVB Financial Group v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Silicon Valley Bank et al
as 5:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
SVB Financial Group
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Silicon Valley Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A.
Interested Party:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its Corporate Capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
SVB Financial Group v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 5:2023cv06543
Plaintiff:
SVB Financial Group
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Pacific Pipeline Company et al v. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors
as 2:2023cv09218
Plaintiff:
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Petitioner:
Pacific Pipeline Company
Respondent:
Santa Barbara County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Troy Ticey, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 23-35614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY TICEY and CYNTHIA TICEY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank and DOES, 1-30
Paramount Fuel, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv04070
Plaintiff:
Paramount Fuel, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Arco Ampm #42549
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES 1-5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
EH Management LLC v. United States Small Business Administration et al
as 2:2023cv04031
Plaintiff:
EH MANAGEMENT LLC, dba ESCAPE HOTEL HOLLYWOOD and EH Management LLC a California corporation doing business as Escape Hotel Hollywood
Defendant:
United States Small Business Administration and Isabella Casillas Guzman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, Alaska Wilderness League, Environment America and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish And Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alaska State Chamber of Commerce, Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Theresa Sweet, et al v. American National University, et al
as 23-15051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THERESA SWEET, CHENELLE ARCHIBALD, DANIEL DEEGAN and others
Intervenor:
AMERICAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC., LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL A. CARDONA, Secretary of the United States Department of Education and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Theresa Sweet, et al v. Lincoln Educational Services Corp, et al
as 23-15050
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THERESA SWEET, CHENELLE ARCHIBALD, DANIEL DEEGAN and others
Intervenor:
LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC., AMERICAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL A. CARDONA, Secretary of the United States Department of Education and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
