Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Alderson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2016cv00580
Plaintiff:
Gerald R. Alderson
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Chan v. J.P. Morgan Chase, N.A.
as 3:2016cv02403
Plaintiff:
Sau King Chan
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johan Pollack et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2016cv01077
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Johan Pollack, PROFESSIONAL EUROPEAN GEM CUTTING INSTITUTE, INC., a California corporation, Johan Pollack and others
Nicolas Tirabassi v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, et al
as 2:2015cv09467
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Tirabassi
Rohillco Business Services LLC et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2015cv02270
Plaintiff:
GAP Funding Company LLC and Rohillco Business Services LLC
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barbara Chakos v. J.P. Morgan Chase et al.
as 8:2015cv00667
Defendant:
Assurant Insurance Company, DOES and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Barbara Chakos
Brosious v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Brosious
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karmela Tehrani v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv07679
Defendant:
Does and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Karmela Tehrani
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sana Swe et al
as 2:2014cv03648
Defendant:
Does, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Sana Swe
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Lewis et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2014cv00386
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Lane Lewis and Oletta Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
