Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
United Fabrics International, Inc. v. Pat Rego, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv05988
Defendant: Does, Lane Bryant Purchasing Corp., Lane Bryant, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United Fabrics International, Inc.
United Fabrics International, v. Lane Bryant, Inc., et al
as 10-56169
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED FABRICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant - Appellant: LANE BRYANT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, CHARMING SHOPPES, INC., INTERNATIONAL NEWPORT GROUP, a California Business Entity Form Unknown Erroneously Sued As Newport Apparel Corporation and others
Defendant: K.E.S. TEXTILE, INC.
DIRECTV Inc v. Burchard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv05453
Defendant: James Bryant Burchard, Cameron Burchard, Able Communications, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: DIRECTV Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Carter Bryant v. Mattel, Inc., et al
as 09-55812
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: CARTER BRYANT, an individual
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Counter-defendant - Appellee: MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity, ISAAC LARIAN, an individual and MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Counter-defendant: CARLOS GUSTAVO MACHADO GOMEZ, an individual and MGAE DE MEXICO, S.R.L. DE C.V., a Mexico business entity
Amicus Curiae: ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE, PUBLIC AFFAIRS ALLIANCE OF IRANIAN AMERICANS, IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION and others
MGA Entertainment, Inc., et al v. Mattel, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-55673
Plaintiff-counter-defendant: CARTER BRYANT, an individual
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Counter-defendant - Appellant: MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity and ISAAC LARIAN, an individual
Counter-defendant: CARLOS GUSTAVO MACHADO GOMEZ, an individual and MGAE DE MEXICO, S.R.L. DE C.V., a Mexico business entity
Movant: OMNI 808 INVESTORS LLC
Third-party-defendant: ANNE WANG
Amicus Curiae: ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE, PUBLIC AFFAIRS ALLIANCE OF IRANIAN AMERICANS, IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION and others
Carter Bryant v. MGA Entertainment, Inc., et al
as 08-57015
Plaintiff-counter-defendant: CARTER BRYANT, an individual
Counter-claimant - Appellee: MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Counter-defendant - Appellant: MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity and ISAAC LARIAN, an individual
Counter-defendant: CARLOS GUSTAVO MACHADO GOMEZ, an individual and MGAE DE MEXICO, S.R.L. DE C.V., a Mexico business entity
Third-party-defendant: ANNE WANG
L. A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Charming Shoppes, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04560
Plaintiff: L. A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L. A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Charming Shoppes, Inc., Fashion Bug Retail Companies, Inc., Lane Bryant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
U.S. Textile Printing, Inc. v. Crew Knitwear, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv04139
Defendant: Burlington Factories, Allen Yum, Fashion Bug and others
Plaintiff: U.S. Textile Printing, Inc. and Attorney Martin Jay Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Smith et al v. Cohen
as 8:2007cv01245
Plaintiff: Jonalyn B Smith, Jinky B Smith and Odessa B Smith
Defendant: Chaim Cohen, Ron Many, Alejandro Coba and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Samsung America Inc v. Lane Bryant Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02166
Plaintiff: Samsung America Inc and Samsung America Inc
Defendant: Lane Bryant Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?