Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. Label Lane International, Inc., et al
as 14-56635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
LABEL LANE INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California Corporation and ENTRY, INC., a California Corporation, DBA ALT B.
Neman Brothers & Associates Inc v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2014cv06821
Defendant:
B Lane Inc., Does, Green Mango Imports Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Neman Brothers & Associates Inc
Dermond Peterson Design LLC v. One Kings Lane, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05534
Plaintiff:
Dermond Peterson Design LLC
Defendant:
Does, One Kings Lane, Inc. and Susan Feldman
HD Buttercup LP v. One Kings Lane Inc et al.
as 2:2014cv05020
Defendant:
Does and One Kings Lane Inc
Plaintiff:
HD Buttercup LP
Memory Lane, Inc. v. Classmates, Inc., et al
as 14-55912
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MEMORY LANE, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
CLASSMATES, INC. and UNITED ONLINE, INC.
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. Label Lane International, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04054
Defendant:
Does, Entry, Inc. and Label Lane International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Malibu Textiles, Inc.
Memory Lane, Inc. v. Classmates, Inc., et al
as 14-55462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEMORY LANE, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CLASSMATES, INC. and UNITED ONLINE, INC.
Sherri Hellbusch v. Stephanie Lane
as 8:2013cv01973
Plaintiff:
Sherri Hellbusch
Defendant:
Stephanie Lane
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. McFadden Lane, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01300
Plaintiff:
Abkco Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., EMI Virgin Songs, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Arthur L. McFadden and McFadden Lane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
L A Printex Industries Inc v. Outlet Division Store Company et al
as 2:2013cv00897
Defendant:
Charming Shoppes Inc, Does, Lane Bryant Inc and others
Plaintiff:
L A Printex Industries Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
