Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Cixi City Liyuan Auto Parts Co. Ltd. v. Yita, LLC
as 5:2023cv02580
Plaintiff: Cixi City Liyuan Auto Parts Co. Ltd.
Defendant: Yita, LLC doing business as Yitamotor, Yita, LLC and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ford Motor Company v. Crov Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv05552
Plaintiff: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Defendant: Crov Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as crov.com, Sunward Logistics USA LLC, Qingdao Hairunkaiyuan Auto Parts Co., Ltd. a Chinese business entity doing business as www.freedream4x4.com doing business as Qingdao Yuanxi Auto Parts Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Southwestern MFG. LLC v. Wilmar LLC et al
as 2:2022cv08541
Plaintiff: Southwestern MFG. LLC
Defendant: Wilmar LLC, Advance Auto Parts Inc. and Carquest Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Motium Inc. et al v. Symeli Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00869
Defendant: AERO WIPERS, OneStopGarage, Michael Yu and others
Plaintiff: Shijiazhuang March Auto Parts Co. Ltd., Motium Inc. and Shijiahuang March Auto Parts Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. et al v. Yahala Trading Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv01413
Defendant: Motor City Parts, Yahala Trading Company dba FourGreen Auto Parts, Yahala Trading Company and others
Plaintiff: Hyundai Motor Company, -, Hyundai Motor America, Inc. and Hyundai Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. et al v. Depo Auto Parts Industrial Co., Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2018cv02151
Defendant: Depo Auto Parts Industrial Co., Ltd. and Maxzone Vehicle Lighting Corp.
Plaintiff: Hyundai Motor Company, - and Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Baxter Auto Parts, Inc. v. Landmark Technology, LLC
as 3:2018cv00629
Plaintiff: Baxter Auto Parts, Inc.
Defendant: Landmark Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 102 Invalidity and Nonenforceability of U.S. Patent
Omix Ada, Inc. v. Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., LTD. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02748
Defendant: Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. and Xianghe Baoliang Metal Products Co., Ltd
Plaintiff: Omix Ada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NOT USED
as 2:2017cv02747
Plaintiff: Omix Ada, Inc.
Defendant: Qingdao Hairunkaiyuan Auto Parts Co., LTD a/k/a Shangdong Kaiyuan vehickle Parts Co., LTD and Xianghe Baoliang Metal Products., Ltd., a/k/a Beijing Yunliang Shunda Trade Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Omix Ada, Inc. v. Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., LTD. et al
as 2:2017cv02851
Defendant: Qingdao Hairunkaiyun Auto Parts Co., Ltd. and Xianghe Baoliang Metal Products Co., Ltd
Plaintiff: Omix Ada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?