Cases 161 - 170 of 35,971
(SS)Rangel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Maria Ines Rangel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Cordero Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Joel Cordero Flores
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Robles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Angelica Maria Robles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Oscar A. Lopez v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Oscar A. Lopez
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Marina Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Liam Alexander v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Deborah Ann Clark v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Robles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00376
Plaintiff:
Angelica Maria Robles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
David Duk Kim v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03889
Plaintiff:
David Duk Son Kim
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mark Alan Woodend v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Woodend
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
