Cases 1 - 10 of 465
Hazel Primous PR firm LLC v. Gail S Ennis et al
as 2:2024cv05252
Plaintiff:
Hazel Primous PR firm LLC
Defendant:
Gail S Ennis, Martin O'Malleys, Yolanda Benetiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Randles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Randy Scott Randles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Reese v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Scott Reese
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reese v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Scott Reese
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jamerson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Scott Dylan Jamerson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scheck v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Scheck
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05315
Plaintiff:
Evans J Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seipp v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Scott Martin Seipp
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scott v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ruth Keralynn Scott
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
