Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Daniel James v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv02416
Defendant:
Does and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Daniel James
Whittington v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv05223
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Whittington v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv05224
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Whittington v. United States Government et al
as 3:2013cv05162
Plaintiff:
Scott A Whittington
Defendant:
United States Government, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
United States of America v. Haines et al
as 3:2013cv05082
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel F Haines, Yoshiko S. Haines, Pierce County and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
United States of America v. Carranza et al
as 1:2012cv02094
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Daniel Carranza and Arica Lynn Carranza
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America v. Carranza et al
as 1:2012at00835
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Daniel Carranza and Arica Lynn Carranza
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America v. Denise Dimacale et al
as 8:2012cv01601
Defendant:
CIT Group Consumer Finance Inc, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Daniel Dimacale and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
James Daniel v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv04916
Plaintiff:
James Daniel
Defendant:
Does and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
