Cases 91 - 100 of 2,341
Murugaiyan v. Anderson, et al.
as 24-1299
Plaintiff:
SENTHIL MOHAN MURUGAIYAN
Defendant:
KATE ANDERSON, General Manager, ESA, Pleasanton, DUSTIN MARTIN, District Manager and ESA MANAGEMENT LLC
Kissner v. Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District, et al.
as 24-1261
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. KISSNER
Defendant:
LOMA PRIETA JOINT UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a California public agency, LISA FRASER, former superintendent at Loma Prieta Joint Union School District, in her official and individual capacities, COREY KIDWELL, former superintendent at Loma Prieta Joint Union School District, in her official and individual capacities and others
Anderson v. O'Malley
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN MARIE ANDERSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Yuksel v. Ventyx Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Omer Yuksel
Defendant:
Ventyx Biosciences, Inc., Raju Mohan, Martin Auster and others
Villarruel v. O'Malley
as 24-1233
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. VILLARRUEL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Paulo v. Williams, et al.
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN PAULO
Defendant:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, JULIE MATOUSEK, MONIQUE HUBBARD-PICKETT and others
Urbach v. O'Malley
as 24-1097
Plaintiff:
THOMAS URBACH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Dos Santos Martins, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1007
Petitioner:
HOSANA DOS SANTOS MARTINS, EDMAR DA SILVA FELIPE and CECILIA MARTINS DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gicharu v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Samuel Kinuthia Gicharu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Martin O'Malley, David T. Wesling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Schlaegel v. Palo Alto Networks Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Martin Schlaegel
Defendant:
Palo Alto Networks Inc., Nikesh Arora, Dipak Golechha and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
