Cases 91 - 100 of 3,389
(PS) Aussieker v. ERC USA et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Mark Aussieker
Defendant:
ERC USA, Lindsay Hughes and Scott Weinbrand
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SCOTT JR. v. LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE
as 3:2024mc80013
Plaintiff:
DARRYL A. SCOTT JR.
Defendant:
LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hukill v. State of California, et al.
as 24-268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON SCOTT HUKILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SEAN LAFFERTY, Judge, JAMES NEAVITT and others
Shuler v. Scott, et al.
as 24-248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL SHULER
Defendant / Appellee:
STUART J. SCOTT, Honorable, Judge Santa Clar County Superior Court, THEODORE C. ZAYNER, Honorable, Judge Santa Clara County Superior Court and DREW C. TAKAICHI, Honorable, Judge Santa Clara County Superior Court
Houston v. Golden Entertainment, et al.
as 24-95
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, STATE OF NEVADA, DIANNE FERRANTE and others
Harvest Small Business Finance et al v. Evan Mitnick et al
as 8:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC and Harvest Commercial Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Evan Mitnick, Michelle Chamness, Michael Sanchez and others
Duncan v. U.S. President Robinette Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alvin J. Duncan
Defendant:
U.S. President Robinette Biden, Sheriff Mike Linder and Scott Twito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Koller, et al. v. Monsanto Company, et al.
as 24-43
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT KOLLER, TIM FERGUSON, RUBY CORNEJO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MONSANTO COMPANY, BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP and THE SCOTTS COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
SEAMLESS CONTROL LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
