Cases 11 - 20 of 220
Jenkins v. Carney
as 24-1370
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LYNN JENKINS
Defendant:
CORMAC J. CARNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE
Blackwell v. Jenkins, et al.
as 24-201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
A. JENKINS
Defendant:
E. BARTKIEWIECZ, T. PRAKASH, IGOR DMYTRIENKO and others
Cerda v. Jenkins, et al.
as 23-4357
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFREDO RAMON CERDA
Respondent / Appellee:
W. Z. JENKINS, II, Warden, MDC and DAVID M. SINGER, U.S. Marshal for the Central District of California
Jenkins v. Broomfield
as 23-3612
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL STEVEN JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Anduril Industries, Inc. v. Salient Motion Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01650
Plaintiff:
Anduril Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Salient Motion Inc., Kai Yin, Jenkins Aidan and others
Nefertiti v. Securities Exchange Commissons "Act"
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Jenkins Nefertiti
Defendant:
Securities Exchange Commissons "Act"
Emma Jean Anderson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv02160
Petitioner:
Emma Jean Anderson, Terry Abbott, John Robert Allman and others
Respondent:
Islamic Republic of Iran and National Iranian Oil Corporation
Interested Party:
Oaktree Capital Management, LP and Oaktree Capital Management LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kamkoff et al v. Hedberg
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Della Kamkoff, John Andrew, Kayla Birch and others
Defendant:
Heidi Hedberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.