Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California, et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2015cv04987
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Anthony Foxx, Federal Highway Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Round Valley Indian Tribes of California and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Friends of Rose Canyon v. Federal Transit Administration et al
as 3:2015cv00789
Plaintiff:
Friends of Rose Canyon
Defendant:
Federal Transit Administration , Anthony Foxx and DOES 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al v. US Dept. of Transportation, et al
as 15-70754
Petitioner:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO. 7, TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO. 42 and others
Intervenor:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, ANTHONY FOXX, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Japanese Village, LLC v. FTA, et al
as 14-56837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAPANESE VILLAGE, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, CAROLYN FLOWERS, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration, PETER M. ROGOFF, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration and others
Beverly Hills Unified School District v. Federal Transit Administration et al
as 2:2013cv08609
Plaintiff:
Beverly Hills Unified School District
Defendant:
Federal Transit Administration, Anthony Foxx, Leslie T. Rogers and others
The City of Beverly Hills v. Federal Transit Administration et al
as 2:2013cv08621
Defendant:
Federal Transit Administration, Anthony Foxx, Leslie T. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Beverly Hills
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
