Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 166
Freeman v. Burbank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01903
Plaintiff: Scott Freeman
Defendant: Russell Burbank, Stephen Hurst, Sunray Asset Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jefferson County, AL et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06561
Plaintiff: Jefferson County, AL, CITY OF MOUNTAIN BROOK, AL, CITY OF PLEASANT GROVE, AL and others
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc., McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Fort Belknap Indian Community v. The United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00103
Plaintiff: Fort Belknap Indian Community
Defendant: The United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
City of Fort Bragg et al v. Mendocino Railway
as 4:2022cv06317
Plaintiff: City of Fort Bragg and California Coastal Commission
Defendant: Mendocino Railway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Freeman v. Burbank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05022
Plaintiff: Scott Freedman and Scott Freeman
Defendant: Russell Burbank, Stephen Hurst, Sunray Asset Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott Freeman, M.D., v. Stephen Hurst, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01433
Defendant: Ceruvia Lifesciences, Sunray Asset Management, Inc., Nico Forte and others
Counter Defendant: Scott Freeman, M.D.
Counter Claimant: Stephen Hurst
Nominal Defendant: Savant Addiction Medicine, LLC, Savant HWP Holdings, Inc. and Savant HWP, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Mendocino Railway v. Ainsworth et al
as 4:2022cv04597
Plaintiff: Mendocino Railway
Defendant: Defendant Jack Ainsworth, City of Fort Bragg and Jack Ainsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Donna Morgan v. Michael Bash et al
as 5:2022mc00007
Plaintiff: Donna Burgundy Morgan, .
Defendant: Michael Bash, Jeremy Bash, Janice McCown and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 22-15928
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?