Cases 11 - 20 of 49
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water, et al v. Pacific Coast Federation of, et al
as 12-15144
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
Defendant:
GARY LOCKE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS/INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESEARCH, THE BAY INSTITUTE, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Pacific Coast Federation of Fi, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 11-17108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, PORT ORFORD OCEAN RESOURCE TEAM and SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED CATCHER BOATS, MIDWATER TRAWLERS COOPERATIVE and ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 3:2011cv04195
Plaintiff:
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA and BAY PLANNING COALITION
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration , UNITED STATES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor_dft:
Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 4:2011cv04118
Plaintiff:
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA and BAY PLANNING COALITION
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration , UNITED STATES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor_dft:
Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 3:2011cv04118
Plaintiff:
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF THE BAY AREA and BAY PLANNING COALITION
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration , UNITED STATES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor_dft:
Center for Biological Diversity
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
KAHEA et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
KAHEA and Food & Water Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Michael D. Tosatto, Eric C. Schwaab and others
Cause Of Action: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Lingwood v. Department of Commerce, et al
as 2:2011cv01063
Plaintiff:
Vickie L Lingwood
Defendant:
Department of Commerce and Gary Locke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
San Joaquin River Group Authority v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2011cv00725
Plaintiff:
San Joaquin River Group Authority
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service , Eric C Schwaab , Natinal Marine Fisheries, Southwest and others
Intervenor:
Central Delta Water Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hawaii Longline Association v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2011cv00230
Plaintiff:
Hawaii Longline Association
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service and Gary Locke
Cause Of Action: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Turtle Island Restoration Netw, et al v. Hawaii Longline Association, et al
as 11-15783
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and KAHEA: THE HAWAIIAN-ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and GARY LOCKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Commerce
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
HAWAII LONGLINE ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
