Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Bernardino Haros v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70779
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
BERNARDINO HAROS
USA v. Luis Haro
as 20-50354
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS STEPHEN HARO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interlink Products International, Inc. v Crowfoot et al
as 2:2020cv02277
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Drew Bohan, Wade Crowfoot and others
Plaintiff:
Interlink Products International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Edward Thomas v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 20-16436
Defendant / Appellee:
S. DUNCAN, RALPH DIAZ, M. ARMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Jose Gonzalez-Haro v. William Barr
as 20-71616
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
JOSE GONZALEZ-HARO
Jorge Beltran-Haro v. William Barr
as 20-70239
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS BELTRAN-HARO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Karim Kamal v. Joseph Farrow, et al
as 20-55065
Defendant:
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, THOMAS HURRELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE HARO, Individual, JOSEPH A. FARROW, Individual capacity, I. J. TILLMAN, Individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARIM CHRISTIAN KAMAL
Renan Haro v. Raythel Fisher
as 19-55664
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RENAN R. HARO
Haro Bezdikian v. Round Sky, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv05047
Defendant:
Round Sky, Inc., Does 1 through 25, inclusive and Round Sky, Inc. a Nevada corporation doing business as Cash Advance USA, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Mr. HARO BEZDIKIAN and Haro Bezdikian
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Adalberto Flores-Haro, et al v. Stephen Slade, et al
as 19-35091
Defendant:
BRIAN MCLEOD, an individual and STEPHEN SLADE, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Y. I., a minor, ADALBERTO FLORES-HARO, ALMA GRANADOS-MILLAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HILLSBORO and WASHINGTON COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
