Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,233
In re: Michael K Allen
as 2:2024rd00050
United States of America v. Wilcox
as 24-3469
Defendant: JUSTIN K. WILCOX, Justin Kaanoi, Ali'i and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3465
Plaintiff: KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant: JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Jane Doe v. Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L. et al
as 2:2024cv03267
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L., Aylo Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem f/k/a MG Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem d/b/a Pornhub, Aylo Usa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Godfrey v. Costner, et al.
as 24-3415
Plaintiff: DIANE K. GODFREY
Defendant: KEVIN COSTNER, HARRISON FORD, SPENCER WRIGHT and others
Graven v. Snow, et al.
as 24-3420
Plaintiff: WILLIAM A. GRAVEN
Defendant: G. MURRAY SNOW, DISTRICT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge, J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, CIRCUIT JUDGE, being sued as an individual and as a federal judge and others
Sivak v. Winmill, et al.
as 24-3379
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: B. LYNN WINMILL, DISTRICT JUDGE, AMANDA K. BRAILSFORD, DISTRICT JUDGE and DAVID C. NYE, DISTRICT JUDGE
Harris v. Muhammad, et al.
as 24-3307
Plaintiff: MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS
Defendant: CLERIC MUHAMMAD, AKA: K. Fasish, JACKSON, SQSP Christian Chaplain and CHARLES RICHEY, Chaplain, Community Resources Manager of the CDCRs Division of Adult Institutions Religious Programs Oversight Unit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hall v. Treasurer of the United States, et al.
as 24-3199
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPLE INC., T-MOBILE US, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?