Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 340
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Warren v. Heartland Homeowners Association, et al.
as 24-1448
Plaintiff: ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant: HEARTLAND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, TAYLOR ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. County of Lane
as 24-855
Plaintiff: NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: COUNTY OF LANE, Oregon
Stoll v. JBS USA Food Company, et al.
as 24-18
Plaintiff / Appellant: LANE STOLL, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: JBS USA FOOD COMPANY, SWIFT BEEF COMPANY and DOES, 1 through 20, inclusive
Linthicum, et al. v. Wagner, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-4292
Plaintiff / Appellant: DENNIS LINTHICUM and BRIAN J. BOQUIST
Plaintiff: REJEANA JACKSON, KLAMATH COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE, JOHN SWANSON and others
Defendant / Appellee: ROB WAGNER, Oregon Senate President, individually and in his official capacity and LAVONNE GRIFFIN-VALADE, Oregon Secretary of State, in her official capacity
Lynch et al v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2023cv01502
Plaintiff: Martin Lynch, Nancy Bender and Linda Littleton
Defendant: Multnomah County, Lane County, Yamhill County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Haynes
as 23-3859
Petitioner: EDWARD LANE HART
Respondent: RON HAYNES
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Lane County, Oregon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01635
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant: Lane County, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01182
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
S and R Global Inc. v. Sun Park et al
as 2:2023cv05116
Plaintiff: S&R Global Inc. and S and R Global Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Saints and Hearts
Counter Claimant: Hye J Park
Defendant: Sun J Park, Heartbox, Inc., Heartbox, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Wisteria Lane and others
Counter Defendant: S and R Global Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Saints & Hearts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?