Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Scott v. JFQ Lending, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Bryon Scott
Defendant:
JFQ Lending, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Voya Financial Advisors, Inc. v. Brady
as 3:2021cv01858
Plaintiff:
Voya Financial Advisors, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott L. Brady
Columbia Riverkeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2021cv01777
Plaintiff:
Columbia Riverkeeper
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Umpqua Watersheds et al v. Chambers et al
as 6:2021cv01505
Plaintiff:
Umpqua Watersheds, Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild
Defendant:
Sherri Chambers and United States Forest Service
Intervenor Defendant:
American Forest Resource Council, Douglas County, Oregon and Scott Timber Company
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Greenspan v. Kingstrom et al
as 3:2021cv00954
Defendant:
Kasey K. Li, Heidi Kingstrom, Barbara Alexander Rev Trust UA Sep 15, 2014 and others
Trustee:
Frank Lin, Scott G. Joe, Linda Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Greenspan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Klamath Forest Alliance v. Blower et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Defendant:
Merv George, Jr., Forest Service, Scott Blower and others
Plaintiff:
Klamath Forest Alliance
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Scott v. Federal Savings Bank
as 3:2021cv00291
Plaintiff:
Bryon Scott
Defendant:
The Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
