Cases 191 - 200 of 317
Adobe Systems, Inc., et al v. USDC-CASJ
as 14-72745
:
In re: ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC. and others
Petitioner:
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
SIDDHARTH HARIHARAN, BRANDON MARSHALL, MICHAEL DEVINE and others
Hard 2 Find Accessories, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00950
Plaintiff:
Hard 2 Find Accessories, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Backhaut et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2014cv02285
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Backhaut , Bouakhay Joy Backhaut and Kenneth Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Backhaut et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2014cv02284
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Backhaut, Bouakhay Joy Backhaut and Kenneth Morris
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Celgard, LLC v. SK Innovation Co., Ltd.
as 5:2014mc80139
Plaintiff:
Celgard, LLC
Defendant:
SK Innovation Co., Ltd.
Miscellaneou:
Apple, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola Mobility, et al
as 14-35393
Defendant / Appellant:
GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and MOTOROLA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
SAS INSTITUTE INC., SIERRA WIRELESS, INC., INTEL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
Motorola Mobility LLC v. Apple Inc
as 3:2014mc80130
Plaintiff:
Motorola Mobility LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc
IPCom et.al. v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2014mc80037
Plaintiff:
IPCom and GMBH & Co. KG
Respondent:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Beau Hodges v. Apple, Inc.
as 14-15106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEAU HODGES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Virnetx, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2014mc80013
Plaintiff:
Virnetx, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Miscellaneou:
RPX Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
