Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Rodriguez v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01537
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 11-16188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T CORP., AT&T SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
:
In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent:
USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant:
EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv04997
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc, Chi Mei Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jensen Enterprises, Inc. v. Oldcastle Precast, Inc., et al
as 09-15861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC., PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT&T SERVICES, INC. and others
Trinity Grand Marketing, LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04377
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., Fulfillment Plus, Inc. and Fulfillment Plus, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trinity Grand Marketing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
La Collina Dal Lago, L.P. et al v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
as 3:2008cv02451
Plaintiff:
La Collina Dal Lago, L.P., La Collina Dal Lago, L.P., La Collina Dal Lago, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Struyk et al v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01314
Plaintiff:
Todd Struyk, Todd Struyk, Cathy Scherzer and others
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
