Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
as 2:2018mc00149
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Respondent:
Times 10 Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Co., Ltd.
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta (China) Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2018mc00129
Respondent:
Shoe Palace Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Ltd., Inc.
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. Anta China Co., Ltd.
as 2:2018mc00116
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Anta (China) Co., Ltd. and Anta China Co., Ltd.
Begay v. China Telecom Americas, Corp.
as 5:2018cv04834
Plaintiff:
Marlene Begay
Defendant:
China Telecom Americas, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Juliana Lu v. Central Bank of Republic of China Taiwan et al
as 2:2018cv03869
Defendant:
Central Bank of Republic of China Taiwan, Does, Japan and others
Plaintiff:
Juliana Lu
Johnnie Garrett et al v. Illinois State et al
as 2:2018cv02930
Petitioner:
Johnnie Garrett and China Anne McClain
Respondent:
Illinois State, People of Sheriff and Warden
Michael Phipps et al v. Abdias Financial, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01922
Defendant:
Abdias Financial, Inc., Noell Crane Systems, Noell Crane Systems China Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Phipps
STM Atlantic N.V. et al v. Dong Yin Development Holdings Limited et al
as 2:2018cv01269
Defendant:
Dong Yin Development Holdings Limited, Ludwig Chang and China Orient Asset Management International Holding Limited
Intervenor:
Global IP USA, Inc., Global-IP Cayman and Global-IP Cayman and Global IP USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Umar Javed, STM Atlantic N.V., STM Group Inc and others
DEPCOM Power, Inc. v. CSUN Solar, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00729
Petitioner:
DEPCOM Power, Inc.
Respondent:
CSUN Solar, Inc. and China Electric Equipment Group Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 201
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. The China Press et al
as 2:2017cv09199
Defendant:
Does and The China Press
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
