Cases 21 - 30 of 229
USA v. June Gibson
as 22-10164
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUNE GIBSON
Wilson v. Garland
as 22-1060
Petitioner:
JUNE MODUPEH WILSON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rosemary D'Augusta, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70119
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA, BRENDA DAVIS, PAMELA FAUST and others
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY D'AUGUSTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Arcell et al v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2022cv02499
Plaintiff:
Mary Katherine Arcell, Keith Dean Bradt, Jose Brito and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet, Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
D'Augusta et al v. American Petroleum Institute et al
as 4:2022cv01979
Plaintiff:
Rosemary D'Augusta, Brenda Davis, Pamela Faust and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, EXXON MOBIL CORP., Chevron Texaco Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Florian Purganan
as 22-80010
Respondent:
In re: FLORIAN PURGANAN, Admitted to the Bar of the NInth Circuit, June 6, 2007
Matthew FurnessIn re: Matthew Furness
as 22-80008
Respondent:
In re: MATTHEW FURNESS, Admitted to Ninth Circuit Bar on June 21, 2012
USA v. Ambrosio Santos
as 22-10035
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMBROSIO SANTOS, AKA June
June Kiran v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 21-35585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUNE KIRAN
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
