Cases 21 - 25 of 25
USA v. Oregon et al
as 3:1968cv00513
Intervenor Defendant:
Alaska Trollers Association
503) 222-4428 (fax:
Bradford H. Lamb
Amicu:
Columbia River Fisherman's Protective Union, Lummi Inidan Nation, Northwest Gillnetter's Association and others
Intervenor:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Nation and others
Respondent:
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Unknown:
Bruce E Didesch, Alan C Stay, Deborah E. Nelson and others
503) 226-0259 (fax:
Robert C. Weaver, Jr.
509) 634-2387 (fax:
Stephen H. Suagee and Stephen H. Suagee
503) 242-9001 (fax:
Craig J. Dorsay and Lea Ann Easton
303) 673-9155 (fax:
Christopher B. Leahy
202) 616-9667 (fax:
Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon and others
541) 737-3590 (fax:
Dr. Howard F. Horton, Ph.D.
208) 334-2690 (fax:
William Stuart Whelan
Defendant:
Makah Tribe, State of Oregon and State of Washington
503) 467-7689 (fax:
Robert S. Banks, Jr.
503) 947-4793 (fax:
David Euan Leith
503) 226-0079 (fax:
Lori Irish Bauman
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3371 Wildlife Under the Lacey Act
Perry Jackson v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.
as 10-71247
Petitioner:
PERRY L. JACKSON
Respondent:
DOMINGO URIBE, Jr.
Tatum v Pliler, et al
as 2:2003cv00324
Plaintiff:
Irvin T Tatum
Defendant:
Cheryl Pliler , T. L. Rosario , E S Alameda, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cintas Corporation v. Bassett et al
as 3:2006cv05133
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Dennis Bassett, Colin Cockreham, Thomas L. Dailey and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
