Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Hung Ha v. New York City Housing Authorit, et al
as 11-15935
Plaintiff - Appellant: HUNG HA
Defendant - Appellee: NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT
George Pappas, et al v. The BOA 401(k) Plan for Legacy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-55570
Plaintiff - Appellee: GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO, BARRY BRAHN and others
Objector - Appellant: THE BANK OF AMERICA 401(K) PLAN FOR LEGACY COMPANIES, as a Successor to the Countrywide Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., ANGELO R. MOZILO, ERIC P. SIERACKI and others
United States of America et al -v- Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00941
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc. , Gilead Sciences Limited (GSL), Gilead Sciences ULC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Ha v. New York City Housing Authority et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011mc80020
Plaintiff: Hung Ha
Defendant: New York City Housing Authority, U.S. Department of Education and U.S. State Department
The New York City Employees' Retirement System et al v. Berry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00246
Plaintiff: The New York City Employees' Retirement System , The Teacher's Retirement System of the City of New York , The New York City Fire Department Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Lisa C. Berry , Scott Kriens , Pradeep Sindhu and others
3rd_party_defendant: Ernst & Young
Miscellaneou: KLA-Tencor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Barry Brahn, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporat, et al
as 09-80192
Plaintiff - Respondent: BARRY BRAHN, SHELLEY B. KATZEFF, GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE CAPITAL V and others
The New York City Employees' R, et al v. Steven Jobs, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-16488
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Plaintiff: MARTIN VOGEL and KENNETH MAHONEY
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN P. JOBS, PETER OPPENHEIMER, FRED ANDERSON and others
Abrams et al v. Washington Mutual Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00388
Plaintiff: Joel Abrams, Joel Abrams, Joel Abrams and others
Defendant: Washington Mutual Inc, Washington Mutual Inc, Kerry K Killinger and others
Movant: Massachusetts Pension Reserve Investment Mangement Board, New York City Police and Fire Pension Funds and WaMu Institutional Investor Group
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garber v. Washington Mutual Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00465
Plaintiff: Robert L Garber and Robert L Garber
Defendant: Washington Mutual Inc, Washington Mutual Inc, Kerry K Killinger and others
Movant: Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management Board, New York City Police & Fire Pension Funds and WaMu Institutional Investor Group
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
DiNapoli, et al v. Logozzo, et al
as 08-55160
Plaintiff: GEORGE PAPPAS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado
Plaintiff - Appellee: THOMAS P. DINAPOLI, Comptroller of the State of New York, as Administrative Head of the New York State and Local Retirement Systems and as Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, and of the New York City Pension Fund
Defendant: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, ANGELO MOZILO and ERIC P. SIERACKI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?