Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Frederick Silver v. Steven Wolfson, et al
as 21-16369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK O. SILVER
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY STEVEN B. WOLFSON, JANE FEMIANO, Hearing Master/ Magistrate DA Clark County Family Child Support Division, VERONICA GOMEZ, Agent DA Clark County Family Child Support Division and others
Danny Fabricant v. A. Miranda, et al
as 21-16345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY FABRICANT
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MIRANDA, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C-2 Case Manager, SHIRLEY BROWN, individually and in her official capacity as Unit C-2 Correctional Counselor, K. ADAMIEC, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit C Manager and others
Cornele Overstreet v. NP Red Rock, LLC
as 21-16220
Petitioner:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR CORNELE A. OVERSTREET
Respondent:
NP RED ROCK, LLC, DBA Red Rock Casino Resort & Spa
Amicus Curiae:
RAYNELL TESKE
Backcountry Against Dumps, et al v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 21-55869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BACKCOUNTRY AGAINST DUMPS, DONNA TISDALE and JOE E. TISDALE
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DARRYL LACOUNTE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, AMY DUTSCHKE, in her official capacity as Regional Director of the Pacific Region of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
TERRA-GEN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC and CAMPO BAND OF DIEGUENO MISSION INDIANS
Robert Stanard v. Maria Dy, et al
as 21-35582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT A. STANARD, AKA Robert Allen Stanard
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA DY, Doctor, FDC SeaTac, DAN SPROUL, Warden, FDC SeaTac, K. MARTINEZ, Physician's Assistant, FDC SeaTac and others
Choc Harper, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-71241
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CHOC HARPER, HARLEY REYNOLDS and SAMUEL L. BIERS
Petitioner:
CHOC HARPER
Respondent:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BRYAN BOWKER, in his official capacity as the Western Regional Director Bureau of Indian Affairs, THE COURT OF INDIAN OFFENSES FOR THE WESTERN REGION-ELKO and others
Ronald Hooks v. Hood River Distillers, Inc.
as 21-35364
Petitioner:
RONALD K. HOOKS, Regional Director of the Nineteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
HOOD RIVER DISTILLERS, INC.
Montana Environmental Informat, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 21-35294
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency, MARCELO CALLE, in his official capacity as Program Support Division Manager of U.S. Office of Surface Mining Western Region, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, in her official capacity as the United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
SPRING CREEK COAL COMPANY LLC and NAVAJO TRANSITIONAL ENERGY COMPANY
WildEarth Guardians v. Spring Creek Coal, LLC, et al
as 21-35262
Defendant:
GLENDA OWENS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Office of Surface Mining, U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, an agency within the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NAVAJO TRANSITIONAL ENERGY COMPANY and SPRING CREEK COAL COMPANY LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Ronald Hooks v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
as 21-35252
Petitioner:
RONALD K. HOOKS, Regional Director of the Nineteenth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., DBA KOIN-TV
Intervenor:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES & TECHNICIANS, THE BROADCASTING AND CABLE TELEVISION WORKERS SECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 51, AFL-CIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
