Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Mark Madrack v. Yahoo! Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00373
Defendant: Yahoo! Inc., Marissa A. Mayer and Kenneth A. Goldman
Plaintiff: Mark Madrack
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case
as 5:2017cv00037
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartline v. Yahoo Inc.
as 5:2016cv07246
Defendant: Yahoo Inc.
Plaintiff: James Hartline
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cody Baker, et al v. Yahoo! Inc.
as 16-16759
Plaintiff - Appellee: CODY BAKER, BRIAN PINCUS, REBECCA ABRAMS and others
Objector - Appellant: PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee: YAHOO! INC.
Sventek v. Yahoo!, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05463
Plaintiff: Maria Sventek
Defendant: Yahoo!, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Antonio Vernon v. CBS Television Studios et al
as 2:2016cv07019
Defendant: ABC Studios, CBS Corporation, CBS Television Studios and others
Plaintiff: Antonio Vernon
PPG Industries, Inc. v. Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co., Ltd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016mc80161
Plaintiff: PPG Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co., Ltd, Benhua Wu and Mei Zhang
Respondent: Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund v. Mayer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00478
Defendant: Marissa Mayer, David Filo, Sue James and others
Plaintiff: UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Application of Russell Knaggs v. Yahoo! Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015mc80281
Petitioner: Russell Knaggs
Respondent: Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?