Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,812
White v. Coffman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01291
Defendant: Klamath River Renewal Corporation, Dave Coffman and Mark Bransom
Plaintiff: David White
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Nicole Aaron et al v. Epson America, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01712
Petitioner: Rick Allen, Dawn Adams, Nicole Aaron and others
Respondent: Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Thompson v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al.
as 24-4777
Defendant: SUSAN B. SWIMLEY, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BENJAMIN J. MANN and others
Plaintiff: PETER THOMPSON
Sharrod Moten v. David O. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv06735
Defendant: George H. Wu, Jennifer L. Thurston, Christopher D. Baker and others
Plaintiff: Sharrod Moten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. General Atomics, et al.
as 24-4740
Defendant: DANZIG, ROSENBERG SHPALL & ZEIGEN, APLC, SAN DIEGO BIZ LAW, APC and others
Plaintiff: TERENCE D. DAVIS
Zito v. Nevada Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-4681
Plaintiff: JORDAN ZITO
Defendant: TAMMI RIGGS, DAVID HARDY, NEVADA SUPREME COURT and others
United States of America v. Hurtado
as 24-4629
Defendant: DAVID ANTHONY HURTADO, JR., David Anthony Huntain and David Anthony Huntann
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McNeff v. Pleasanton Police Department, et al.
as 24-4651
Plaintiff: PETER MCNEFF
Defendant: LARRY COX, CITY OF PLEASANTON, PLEASANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Fuentes Aguilar De Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4605
Petitioner: LISMARY LISANIA FUENTES AGUILAR DE PEREZ and ELMER DAVID PEREZ-FUENTES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States Gypsum Company v. David Pereg
as 8:2024cv01632
Plaintiff: United States Gypsum Company
Defendant: David Pereg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?