Cases 31 - 40 of 262
James Hundley v. Donald Poag, et al
as 20-16797
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE HEGGE, STATE OF NEVADA, GEORGE HANDLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DERRICK HUNDLEY
Wolf v. Idaho State Bd. of Corr., et al
as 20-35600
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY HRANAC, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF CORRECTION, SUSAN WESSLESS and others
Defendant:
LEROY PENAKU
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW J.J. WOLF
Christine Baker v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al
as 20-16218
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON LEROY, MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, MONICA DERRICK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE BAKER
Derrick Martin King v. The Taft University System, Inc.
as 8:2020cv01068
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin King
Defendant:
The Taft University System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Amazon.com, Inc. v. Derrick S. Lee
as 2:2020cv03718
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Defendant:
Derrick S. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Derrick Wheaten v. S. Knoll, et al
as 20-15442
Defendant / Appellee:
GILLIAM, Health Services Administrator, D. WILDES, Correctional Counselor, S. KNOLL, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK WHEATEN
Defendant:
APPLETON
Derrick Van v. Maricopa County Superior Court, et al
as 20-15321
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK JULIUS VAN
Respondent:
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, named as the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Maricopa
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE
Derrick Johnson v. Superior Court of the State, et al
as 20-15231
Respondent / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSOCIATIONS and SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR KINGS COUNTY
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK LYNN JOHNSON, AKA Derrick L. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Derrick Steilman v. Reginald Michael, et al
as 20-35103
Respondent / Appellee:
REGINALD D. MICHAEL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK E. STEILMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
