Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 807
Ajanel-Ramos v. Garland
as 21-616
Petitioner: FELICIANA AJANEL-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruiz Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3834
Petitioner: JULIA MARINA RUIZ RAMOS and CHELSEY YAHAIRA FELIPE RUIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos-Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3774
Petitioner: ERICA RAMOS-RAMOS, SARA LUPITA CARRILLO-RAMOS and SANTA ROSA CARRILLO-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alvarez Ramos v. Garland
as 23-3725
Petitioner: JOSE ANTONIO ALVAREZ RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villatoro-Ramos v. Garland
as 23-3711
Petitioner: CINDY SARAI VILLATORO-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Penaloza Alcantar, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3652
Petitioner: IGNACIO PENALOZA ALCANTAR and MARIA GUADALUPE ORTUNO RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In Re Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018ml02814
Defendant: Ford Motor Co. DPS6 Powershift Transmission Products Liability Litigation and Liaison Counsel for Defendants
Plaintiff: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs, Matthew Finamore, Florinda Esparza and others
Special Master: Hon. Gary Allen Feess
Petitioner: Mark Fields, Bennie Fowler, Alan Draper and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Raj Nair and Robert Fascetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Ramos Palacios v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-615
Petitioner: CLAUDIA BEATRIZ RAMOS PALACIOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Del Rivas Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3463
Petitioner: MARISELA DEL RIVAS RAMOS and E. M. H.-R.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santos Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1539
Petitioner: MARITZA ESTELA SANTOS RAMOS and CARLOS IVAN RAMOS SANTOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?