Cases 31 - 40 of 51
USA, et al v. USDC-ORE
as 18-71928
:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, SHAUN DONOVAN and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Real Party In Interest:
KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK and others
The Estate of Marie Rivera v. United States Secretary of Defense
as 3:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Marie Rivera
Defendant:
United States Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Puget Soundkeeper Alliance et al v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 3:2017cv05458
Defendant / Appellant:
Secretary of the Navy
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Secretary of Defense and Alan Schrader
Plaintiff:
Suquamish Tribe, Puget Soundkeeper Alliance and Washington Environmental Council
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy, Captain Alan Schrader, Jim Mattis and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
USA, et al v. USDC-ORE
as 17-71692
:
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, SHAUN DONOVAN and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director o fthe Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Real Party In Interest:
KELSEY CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK and others
TDY Holdings, LLC, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-56483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TDY HOLDINGS, LLC and TDY INDUSTRIES, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and ASHTON B. CARTER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense
Amicus Curiae:
THE NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
Ctr for Biological Diversity, et al v. Ashton Carter, et al
as 15-15695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, TURTLE ISLAND RESTORATION NETWORK, JAPAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAWYERS FEDERATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHTON CARTER, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Defense and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Milner v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 2:2014cv01032
Plaintiff:
Glen Scott Milner
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense , Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board , Department of Defense Office of Freedom of Information and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Leon E. Panetta, et al v. John Worthington
as 14-35572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WORTHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE GREGOIRE, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Washington, ROBERT MCKENNA, in his official capacity as Washington Attorney General, JERRY KOSIEROWSKI, in his official capacity as Counterdrug Coordinator for the Washington National Guard Counterdrug Task Force and others
Vietnam Veterans of America, et al v. CIA, et al
as 14-15108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, Veterans Rights Organization, TIM MICHAEL JOSEPHS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, JOHN BRENNAN, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Vietnam Veterans of America, et al v. CIA, et al
as 13-17430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, SWORDS TO PLOWSHARES, Veterans Rights Organization, TIM MICHAEL JOSEPHS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, JOHN BRENNAN, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
