Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intern, et al
as 20-16176
Not Classified By Court:
ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator
State of California et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2020cv01563
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Thomas B. Modly, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. House of Representatives
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California et al v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv00682
Defendant:
Seema Verma, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Plaintiff:
State of California, District of Columbia, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant:
SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17501
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-56377
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
Navajo Nation v. USDOI, et al
as 19-17088
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAVAJO NATION
State of California et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv06013
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Nevada, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
