Cases 31 - 40 of 2,038
Quintana v. Lermond Psy, D, et al.
as 24-1733
Plaintiff:
PAUL NAVARRETE QUINTANA
Defendant:
CYNTHIA E. LERMOND PSY, D, individual capacity, official capacity, NICOLE PAGLIONE, PSY, D., individual capacity, official capacity, MELINDA WOLBRANSKY, PSY, D., individual capacity, official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Psaila v. Girardi, et al.
as 24-1433
Defendant:
ERIKA GIRARDI, Erika Jayne, AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PSAILA
Barton v. Real Innovation Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05194
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
Real Innovation Inc, Richardson Marketing Group LLC, Deryck D Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Parviz v. Barron, et al.
as 24-1315
Respondent:
HOWARD C. BARRON, Warden, Federal Detention Center Sea Tac, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, H. Barron and others
Petitioner:
MAHSA PARVIZ
Ashley v. Moore, et al.
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
G. ASHLEY
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, JUSTIN PETERS, Officer, No. 37708, EDGAR MURO, Officer, No. 36863 and others
Adamo v. Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Frankie J. Adamo
Defendant:
Nextdoor Holdings, Inc., Sarah J. Friar, Michael Doyle and others
Peters v. Cohen
as 24-1040
Plaintiff:
JAN PETERS
Defendant:
MALIA M. COHEN, replacing Betty T. Yee, in her official capacity as Chief Fiscal Officer, State Controller of The State of California, and as Trustee of The Unclaimed Property Fund
Char v. Tresch, et al.
as 24-868
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
MAURA TRESCH, RICHARD BANNER, DEANE HATAKEYAMA and others
United States of America v. Costa
as 1:2024mc00018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jayson Peter Costa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
