Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02332
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Scott Rosson v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
as 2:2017cv06442
Defendant: CitiMortgage Inc, DOES and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Plaintiff: Scott Rosson
In re: Salma Agha-Khan v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-71883
: In re: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Petitioner: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest: BRETT P. RYAN, JONATHAN J. DAMEN, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02954
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02955
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv02966
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03439
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00389
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sue v. Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell
as 1:2016mc00358
Plaintiff: Cheryl Sue
Defendant: Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell, Rush Moore, LLP, Stewart Law Offices and others
Cheryl Sue of the House of Marshall etc. v. Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell
as 1:2016mc00361
Plaintiff: Cheryl Sue
Defendant: Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell, Rush Moore, LLP, Stewart Law Offices and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?