Cases 41 - 50 of 742
Han Huang v. USPS, et al
as 19-16294
Defendant / Appellee:
CHANCE LYBARGER, ROBERTO LOLENG, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAN JING HUANG
Aror O'Diah v. William Benton, et al
as 19-16052
Defendant / Appellee:
HERTZ CORP., Rent A Car, HENCH, Executive Director, WESTERN UNION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
McDermott v. Brennan et al
as 2:2019cv00714
Plaintiff:
Lance P McDermott
Defendant:
Megan Brennan and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward Binns v. USA, et al
as 19-55481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD WAYNE BINNS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cedric Greene, Jr., et al v. USPS
as 19-35214
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRIC GREENE, Jr.
Plaintiff:
KATRICE CYPHERS
(PS) Dumas v. Department of Motor Vehicles, Lodi CA et al
as 2:2019cv00383
Defendant:
Department of Motor Vehicles, Lodi CA, United States Postal Service and Regulation Authority for Banking
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D. Dumas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Shu v. USPS, et al
as 19-15196
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY ALA, PRISCILLA JENG RIVERA, DONNY SWARTZ and others
Defendant:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN and NANCY HUTT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SHU
Estanislao F. Obispo Jr. v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2018cv10321
Defendant:
Guy Loya, United States Postal Service, Megan J. Brennan and others
Plaintiff:
Estanislao F. Obispo Jr. and Estanislao F Obispo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Search Warrant
as 2:2018mj01797
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel bearing label number 9505 5142 4657 8186 2315 70 (1)
Search Warrant
as 2:2018mj01797
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel bearing label number 9505 5142 4657 8186 2315 70 (1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
