Cases 51 - 60 of 394
Ziqi Zhang v. 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04937
Plaintiff:
Ziqi Zhang
Defendant:
17 Education & Technology Group Inc., Andy Chang Liu, Michael Chao Du and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Don Q. Tran v. Chief Justice Tan Gorre Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 2:2022cv03696
Plaintiff:
Don Q. Tran
Defendant:
Chief Justice Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye, Associate Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Associate Justice Goodwin H. Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Zhongtian Liu, et al
as 22-50103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ZHONGTIAN LIU, AKA Big Boss, AKA Chairman, AKA UL, AKA Uncle Liu, AKA Liu Zhongtian, CHINA ZHONGWANG HOLDINGS, ZHAOHUA CHEN, AKA Uncle Chen, AKA Chen Zhaohua and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PERFECTUS ALUMINIUM INC, PERFECTUS ALUMINUM ACQUISITIONS, LLC, SCUDERIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
Moement, Inc. v. Groomore, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02871
Plaintiff:
Moement, Inc.
Defendant:
Groomore, Inc., Chunliang Lin, Jie Zhang and others
JJ Marketing Group, Inc. et al v. Dr. K in LA Entertainment et al
as 2:2022cv01657
Defendant:
Kai Wu, Dr.K in LA Entertainment, Louis Wu and others
Plaintiff:
JJ Marketing Group, Inc., SK Investment and Management LLC, Kington Jewlery USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liu v. Garland
as 22-341
Petitioner:
LIANGYING LIU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Assef v. Xueer et al
as 3:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Shaharm Assef
Defendant:
Mi Xueer, Global Guarantees, Inc., Mingomega Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ba
Reiner v. Navarette et al
as 3:2021cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark Reiner and Martin Reiner
Defendant:
Jorge Navarette, Tom Zhang, Tani Cantil-Sakauye and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
