Cases 51 - 60 of 140
SA California Group Inc et al v. Sonoma Village West LLC et al
as 5:2012cv02066
Defendant:
Rhonda Deringer, Does and Sonoma Village West LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cross Defendant:
PFF Bank & Trust, SA California Group Inc and US Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
PFF Bank & Trust, SA California Group Inc and US Bank National Association
Cross Claimant:
Sonoma Village West LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv09247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
v. Nelson Kennard et al
as 2:2012at01345
Defendant:
Nelson Kennard and US Bank National Association, ND
Plaintiff:
Huy Thanh Vo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Licup et al v. Downey Savings and Loan Association , F.A. et al
as 5:2012cv03995
Plaintiff:
Homer Licup and Ann Lizette Licup
Defendant:
Downey Savings and Loan Association , F.A., DSL Service Company, US Bank Home Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US Bank National Association v. Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLC et al
as 2:2012mc00122
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLC, Nesbitt Blue Ash Property LLC, Nesbitt Colorado Springs Property LLC and others
Receiver:
Alan Tantleff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US Bank National Association v. Jesus Medina et al
as 8:2012cv00475
Defendant:
Does, Jesus Medina and Micaela Fabiola Medina
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Ana Zavala v. Provident Funding Associates LP et al
as 8:2012cv00381
Defendant:
Jason Cotton, Does, First American Title Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ana Zavala
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
