Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-56745
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nelson v. AT&T Mobility, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv04802
Plaintiff: Kip Nelson
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Holman, et al v. Apple, Inc., et al
as 10-80145
Plaintiff - Respondent: PAUL HOLMAN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LUCY RIVELLO, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, VINCENT SCOTTI and others
Defendant - Petitioner: APPLE, INC. and AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
William Creasman v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 8:2010cv01017
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: William Creasman
AU Optronics Corporation, et al v. USDCSF, et al
as 10-71745
: In re: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Petitioner: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Respondent: USDC, SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Real Party In Interest: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant: CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Adams v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00763
Plaintiff: Ashley Adams
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC and The Hacker Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Charles Yeager v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 10-80074
Plaintiff - Respondent: CHARLES E. YEAGER
Defendant - Petitioner: AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Angela Gaspar et al v. AT & T Mobility, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02136
Defendant: AT & T Inc., AT & T Mobility, LLC and Does
Plaintiff: Angela Gaspar and Darrin Willard

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?