Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Jones v. Morgan, et al.
as 24-2271
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JONES
Defendant:
DARYL MORGAN, JOHN HOFFMAN and MATTHEW GILLIS
Hollamon v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA AARON HOLLAMON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHAEL R. MOORE, LAPD Police Chief, S. SMITH, Officer; Serial No. 33751 and others
In the Matter of Thomas Oscar Gillis SBN 040186
as 3:2022mc80174
Respondent:
Thomas Oscar Gillis
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
James Herndon v. M. Gillis, et al
as 21-16720
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M HERNDON
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT M. GILLIS, OFFICER L. GOOD, OFFICER A. NELSON and others
Greenspan et al v. Gillis Management Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01016
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Greenspan and Aequitas Capital Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Gillis Management Solutions, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
United States of America v. Joel Barry Gillis
as 2:2021cv04003
Defendant:
JOEL BARRY GILLIS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garnishee:
Pacific Premier Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205
Gerald Montag v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 2:2021cv03678
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Mark Gillies, Scott Keogh and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald M. Montag
David Merritt, et al v. USDC-CASJ
as 18-71480
:
In re: DAVID MERRITT, pro se and SALMA MERRITT
Petitioner:
DAVID MERRITT, pro se and SALMA MERRITT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENT II, INC., JAMIE DIMOND and others
Star Fabrics, Inc. v. Zulily LLC et al
as 2:2017cv09272
Defendant:
Benisti USA LLC, DOES, Firmiana Fashion Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Jitrade, Inc. v. 2NE1 Apparel, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05349
Defendant:
2NE1 Apparel, Inc., Yum Cho, Collective Rack and others
Plaintiff:
Jitrade, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
