Cases 1 - 10 of 926
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sivak v. Bennett, et al.
as 24-4954
Defendant:
MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE, Judge and RYAN D. NELSON, CIRCUIT JUDGE, Judge
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Jayaton-Kerry, et al. v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California
as 24-4846
Real Party In Interest:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, THOMAS J. HOLTHUS, MELISSA ROBBINS COUTTS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Petitioner:
THOMAS JAYATON-KERRY and MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, Trust Pre-1933 Private American Indian
Evans v. Nelson, et al.
as 24-4713
Defendant:
CARRIE BROSNAN, Pharmacy Technician TRCI, KEVIN HODGES, SHANNON JOHNSTON, TRCI Medical Manager and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES EVANS
Brown v. Tromba, et al.
as 24-4590
Defendant:
DANAE ADAMS, STEVE WOLFSON, AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
MARLON LORENZO BROWN
Lawson v. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
as 24-4288
Petitioner:
KENNETH LAWSON
Real Party In Interest:
DAVID LASSNER, CAMILLE NELSON, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Hernandez-Pichinte, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4234
Petitioner:
ROXANA LIZBETH GUILLEN-PILAR, NELSON EDUARDO HERNANDEZ-PICHINTE and NELSON OMAR HERNANDEZ-GUILLEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amador Bonilla v. Garland
as 24-4221
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
NELSON ALFREDO AMADOR BONILLA
Heather, et al. v. Healthline Media, Inc.
as 24-4168
Defendant:
HEALTHLINE MEDIA, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff:
KELSEY NELSON and ALEXANDRIA HEATHER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
