Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,303
Alexander v. Chime
as 3:2024cv00979
Plaintiff: Liam Alexander
Defendant: Chime
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Alexander v. Bank of America
as 3:2024cv00950
Plaintiff: Liam Alexander
Defendant: Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
G and G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. McKinley P. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv04385
Plaintiff: G and G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant: McKinley P. Alexander individually doing business as Swank Mens Fashion and Swank Mens Fashion LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Swank Mens Fashion
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Portillo Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3291
Petitioner: NERY ALEXANDER PORTILLO RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Favor v. Minaj, et al.
as 24-3115
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: NIKKI MINAJ, MAXINE A. and BABY CASH MONEY RECORDS
Favor v. Harper
as 24-3116
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: RAQUEL HARPER
Xen Saquic, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2929
Petitioner: JOSSELINE CLARISA XEN SAQUIC and MANUEL ESTEBAN ALEXANDER CONOZ XEN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff: ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant: RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2947
Petitioner: JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO, ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?