Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 711
Nguyen v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3844
Plaintiff: DAI NGUYEN
Defendant: K. WILLIAMS, Counselor, CC2, D. ZEPEDA, Counselor, D. GRAY, Counselor and others
In re: Olivia Tho-Xuan Thi Nguyen
as 2:2024rd00071
Not Yet Classified: Olivia Tho-Xuan Thi Nguyen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02818
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Naturalization Ceremony 06/05/24
as 5:2024mc80135
Not Yet Classified: Eunice Apalis Alejandro, Maria Montserrat Riojas Moreno, Thu Thanh Minh Nguyen and others
United States of America v. Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen
as 8:2024cv01047
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
United States of America v. Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen
as 8:2024cv00682
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen, Sandy Mai Trang Hoang and Mai Trang Hoang
Garnishee: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Fidelity Management Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00868
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff: NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant: CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 24-2364
Defendant: THANH NGUYEN and Poway
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 24-2221
Plaintiff: MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?