Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Gonzalez Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3347
Petitioner:
LIZBETH GONZALEZ RODRIGUEZ, ABAD EUGENIO ANGEL GONZALEZ and JOSUE SIMON GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rafael Gonzalez-Flores v. William Barr
as 20-73254
Petitioner:
RAFAEL ANGEL GONZALEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Miguel Gonzalez Cortez v. William Barr
as 20-71824
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GONZALEZ CORTEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Angel Gonzalez v. Net Pay Advance, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06516
Plaintiff:
Angel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Net Pay Advance, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant:
STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
USA v. Francisco Najera-Gordillo
as 17-10536
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO MIGUEL ANGEL NAJERA-GORDILLO, AKA Miguel Angel Gonzalez
Angel Gonzalez-Garcia v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71880
Petitioner:
ANGEL GONZALEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. Miguel Martinez-Villareal
as 14-10121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL, AKA Sergio Ponce De Leon, AKA Miguel Angel Gonzalez, AKA Miguel Gonzalez-Martinez, AKA Miguel Gonzalez-Villareal, AKA Miguel Martinez, AKA Mario Sanchez
USA v. Miguel Martinez-Villareal
as 14-10125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL, AKA Miguel Angel Gonzalez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
